Dave's Blog

Can Lakes jurisdictions see Tribes as ally and equal?

Much of this blog is about the progress, or lack of same, on the proposed "Annex 2001 implementing agreements" that seek to set down Great Lakes state and province rules that would limit water exports. The draft is being torn apart between those who want no limits (short-sighted consuming industries) and those who want even stronger limits, or an outright prohibition (environmental groups, grassroots organizations). Since it's a rule of thumb in politics that it's easier to kill than enact something, this setup means the pact is heading for an early grave, probably to be papered over with some sort of general statement of philosophy.

But there's a way out for the states and provinces most concerned, although it is not uncomplicated. Treat Native American Tribes and First Nations as sovereign nations with an equal stake in the fate of the Lakes -- and invoke the legal protection and leadership they would bring to the table. There are political reasons why this would be difficult, but difficulty is not a sufficient reason to turn back from protection of 18% of the world's surface fresh water.

Here's more on the current status of Native American and First Nations participation. So far, the Council of Great Lakes Governors is off the mark.

http://www.detnews.com/2004/metro/0411/27/metro-17163.htm